Finland vs United States: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Finland
- United States
How they compare
Finland currently reports 78.85 against 78.69 in United States, a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was United States ahead.
Finland ranks 26th and United States ranks 27th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and United States in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.73 | 84.38 | 4.65 | United States |
| 2010s | 79.94 | 79.48 | 0.4605 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Finland or United States?
- Finland, at 78.85 against 78.69 in United States as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Finland and United States?
- 0.16, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and United States?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Finland and United States rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Finland ranks 26th and United States ranks 27th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.