Ghana vs Slovenia: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Ghana
58.65
in 2014
Slovenia
57.65
in 2014
Ghana rank
124th
Slovenia rank
126th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Ghana
  • Slovenia
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 58.65 against 57.65 in Slovenia, a difference of 1.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 124th and Slovenia ranks 126th of 181 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 46.65 51.39 4.74 Slovenia
2010s 50.92 55.14 4.21 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Ghana or Slovenia?
Ghana, at 58.65 against 57.65 in Slovenia as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Ghana and Slovenia?
1, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Slovenia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Ghana and Slovenia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Ghana ranks 124th and Slovenia ranks 126th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.