Guinea-Bissau vs Lebanon: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Lebanon
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 44.76 against 42.42 in Lebanon, a difference of 2.34.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 159th and Lebanon ranks 162nd of 183 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.2 | 42.65 | 3.55 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 45.63 | 44.14 | 1.48 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Lebanon?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 44.76 against 42.42 in Lebanon as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Lebanon?
- 2.34, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lebanon?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Lebanon rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 159th and Lebanon ranks 162nd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.