Guinea-Bissau vs Pakistan: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Pakistan
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 44.76 against 44.69 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 160th and Pakistan ranks 161st of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.2 | 43.45 | 2.75 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 45.63 | 48.4 | 2.77 | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Pakistan?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 44.76 against 44.69 in Pakistan as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Pakistan?
- 0.07, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Pakistan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Pakistan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 160th and Pakistan ranks 161st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.