Iceland vs Oman: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Iceland
77.64
in 2014
Oman
76.3
in 2014
Iceland rank
32nd
Oman rank
34th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Iceland
  • Oman
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 77.64 against 76.3 in Oman, a difference of 1.34.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 32nd and Oman ranks 34th of 181 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Oman Difference Ahead
2000s 76.04 73.89 2.15 Iceland
2010s 77.54 75.92 1.62 Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Iceland or Oman?
Iceland, at 77.64 against 76.3 in Oman as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Iceland and Oman?
1.34, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Oman?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Iceland and Oman rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Iceland ranks 32nd and Oman ranks 34th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.