Iran vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Iran
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Iran currently reports 62.37 against 62.14 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Iran ranks 108th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.36 | 59.13 | 29.77 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 61.88 | 61.65 | 0.2304 | Iran |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Iran or Papua New Guinea?
- Iran, at 62.37 against 62.14 in Papua New Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Iran and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.23, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Papua New Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Iran and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Iran ranks 108th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.