Italy vs Trinidad and Tobago: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Italy
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 63.27 against 63.04 in Italy, a difference of 0.23.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 105th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.53 | 63.27 | 0.264 | Italy |
| 2010s | 62.96 | 63.26 | 0.3048 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Italy or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 63.27 against 63.04 in Italy as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Italy and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0.23, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Italy and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Italy ranks 105th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.