Lao PDR vs Nepal: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Lao PDR
72.13
in 2014
Nepal
71.74
in 2014
Lao PDR rank
55th
Nepal rank
58th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Lao PDR
  • Nepal
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Lao PDR currently reports 72.13 against 71.74 in Nepal, a difference of 0.39.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Lao PDR has been ahead every year.

Lao PDR ranks 55th and Nepal ranks 58th of 181 countries.

Lao PDR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao PDR Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 84.04 76.82 7.22 Lao PDR
2010s 79.56 61.28 18.28 Lao PDR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Lao PDR or Nepal?
Lao PDR, at 72.13 against 71.74 in Nepal as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Lao PDR and Nepal?
0.39, with Lao PDR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao PDR and Nepal?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Lao PDR and Nepal rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Lao PDR ranks 55th and Nepal ranks 58th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.