Mali vs Sudan: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Mali
56
in 2014
Sudan
54.48
in 2014
Mali rank
131st
Sudan rank
133rd

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mali
  • Sudan
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Mali currently reports 56 against 54.48 in Sudan, a difference of 1.52.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mali ahead.

Mali ranks 131st and Sudan ranks 133rd of 181 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mali Sudan Difference Ahead
2000s 38.02 36.61 1.42 Mali
2010s 52.84 51.16 1.68 Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Mali or Sudan?
Mali, at 56 against 54.48 in Sudan as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Mali and Sudan?
1.52, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Sudan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Mali and Sudan rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Mali ranks 131st and Sudan ranks 133rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.