Mauritius vs South Africa: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Mauritius
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 64.47 against 64.43 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.04.
Across all 10 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 102nd and South Africa ranks 101st of 183 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.26 | 66.54 | 5.28 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 63.08 | 66.65 | 3.57 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Mauritius or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 64.47 against 64.43 in Mauritius as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Mauritius and South Africa?
- 0.04, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and South Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mauritius and South Africa rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Mauritius ranks 102nd and South Africa ranks 101st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.