Montenegro vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Montenegro
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 62.14 against 62.06 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.08.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 112th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 183 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.2 | 59.46 | 22.25 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 44.44 | 61.65 | 17.21 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Montenegro or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 62.14 against 62.06 in Montenegro as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Montenegro and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.08, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Montenegro and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Montenegro ranks 112th and Papua New Guinea ranks 111th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.