Nepal vs Zambia: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Nepal
71.74
in 2014
Zambia
72.01
in 2014
Nepal rank
58th
Zambia rank
56th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Nepal
  • Zambia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 72.01 against 71.74 in Nepal, a difference of 0.27.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 58th and Zambia ranks 56th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 76.82 58.36 18.45 Nepal
2010s 61.28 68.19 6.9 Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Nepal or Zambia?
Zambia, at 72.01 against 71.74 in Nepal as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Nepal and Zambia?
0.27, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Zambia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Nepal and Zambia rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Nepal ranks 58th and Zambia ranks 56th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.