Nicaragua vs Puerto Rico: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Nicaragua
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 52.56 against 52.4 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.16.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 141st and Puerto Rico ranks 140th of 183 countries.
Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.82 | 57.52 | 12.7 | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 48.2 | 51.98 | 3.78 | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Nicaragua or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 52.56 against 52.4 in Nicaragua as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Nicaragua and Puerto Rico?
- 0.16, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Puerto Rico?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Nicaragua and Puerto Rico rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Nicaragua ranks 141st and Puerto Rico ranks 140th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.