Papua New Guinea vs Ukraine: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Ukraine
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 62.14 against 61.99 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.15.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 111th and Ukraine ranks 114th of 183 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.13 | 1.33 | 57.79 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 61.65 | 31.71 | 29.94 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Papua New Guinea or Ukraine?
- Papua New Guinea, at 62.14 against 61.99 in Ukraine as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Papua New Guinea and Ukraine?
- 0.15, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Ukraine rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 111th and Ukraine ranks 114th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.