Peru vs Rwanda: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Peru
64.83
in 2014
Rwanda
65.27
in 2014
Peru rank
98th
Rwanda rank
97th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Peru
  • Rwanda
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 65.27 against 64.83 in Peru, a difference of 0.44.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Peru ahead.

Peru ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 97th of 181 countries.

Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 60.91 40.53 20.37 Peru
2010s 62.79 60.75 2.05 Peru

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Peru or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 65.27 against 64.83 in Peru as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Peru and Rwanda?
0.44, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Rwanda?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Peru and Rwanda rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Peru ranks 98th and Rwanda ranks 97th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.