Poland vs Suriname: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Poland
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 74.13 against 74 in Poland, a difference of 0.13.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 47th and Suriname ranks 46th of 181 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52.78 | 70.66 | 17.88 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 67.27 | 72.31 | 5.04 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Poland or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 74.13 against 74 in Poland as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Poland and Suriname?
- 0.13, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Poland and Suriname rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Poland ranks 47th and Suriname ranks 46th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.