Samoa vs Viet Nam: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score

Samoa
77.95
in 2014
Viet Nam
78.66
in 2014
Samoa rank
31st
Viet Nam rank
28th

Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time

  • Samoa
  • Viet Nam
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Viet Nam currently reports 78.66 against 77.95 in Samoa, a difference of 0.71.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Samoa ahead.

Samoa ranks 31st and Viet Nam ranks 28th of 181 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Samoa Viet Nam Difference Ahead
2000s 78.51 77.72 0.7849 Samoa
2010s 78.55 78.31 0.2399 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Samoa or Viet Nam?
Viet Nam, at 78.66 against 77.95 in Samoa as of 2014.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Samoa and Viet Nam?
0.71, with Viet Nam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Viet Nam?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Samoa and Viet Nam rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
Samoa ranks 31st and Viet Nam ranks 28th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.