South Africa vs Türkiye: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- South Africa
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 64.8 against 64.47 in South Africa, a difference of 0.33.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 101st and Türkiye ranks 99th of 184 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.54 | 45.18 | 21.36 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 66.65 | 59.08 | 7.57 | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, South Africa or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 64.8 against 64.47 in South Africa as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between South Africa and Türkiye?
- 0.33, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Türkiye?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Africa and Türkiye rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- South Africa ranks 101st and Türkiye ranks 99th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.