Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Sweden: Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 83.3 against 82.16 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 1.14.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 12th of 184 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.48 | 79.67 | 2.81 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 82.44 | 81.93 | 0.5178 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 83.3 against 82.16 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2014.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
- 1.14, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden rank globally for dealing with construction permits (db06-15 methodology) - score?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 15th and Sweden ranks 12th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for dealing with construction permits is the simple average of the scores for each of the component indicators: the procedures, time, cost to deal with construction permits, as well as the building quality control index that evaluate the quality of building regulations, the strength of quality control and safety mechanisms, liability and insurance regimes and professional certification requirements. The score is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.