Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Guinea-Bissau: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
68
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau
68
in 2019
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
55th
Guinea-Bissau rank
55th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of currently reports 68 against 68 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 55th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 55th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68 | 68 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 68 | 68 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Guinea-Bissau?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, at 68 against 68 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Guinea-Bissau?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 55th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 55th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.