Albania vs Brazil: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Albania
44
in 2019
Brazil
45.56
in 2019
Albania rank
155th
Brazil rank
154th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Albania
  • Brazil
01020304050200520122019

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 45.56 against 44 in Albania, a difference of 1.56.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Brazil has been ahead every year.

Albania ranks 155th and Brazil ranks 154th of 188 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Brazil Difference Ahead
2000s 24 40.8 16.8 Brazil
2010s 23.2 45.09 21.89 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Albania or Brazil?
Brazil, at 45.56 against 44 in Albania as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Albania and Brazil?
1.56, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Brazil?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Albania and Brazil rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Albania ranks 155th and Brazil ranks 154th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.