Antigua and Barbuda vs Brazil: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
44
in 2019
Brazil
45.56
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
157th
Brazil rank
156th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Brazil
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 45.56 against 44 in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 1.56.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 157th and Brazil ranks 156th of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 1 and Brazil in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.6 | 40.8 | 4.8 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 44 | 45.09 | 1.09 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Brazil?
- Brazil, at 45.56 against 44 in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil?
- 1.56, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Brazil rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 157th and Brazil ranks 156th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.