Antigua and Barbuda vs Niger: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Antigua and Barbuda
44
in 2019
Niger
44
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
155th
Niger rank
155th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Niger
1020304050200520122019

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 44 against 44 in Niger, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 155th and Niger ranks 155th of 188 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Niger Difference Ahead
2000s 45.6 36.8 8.8 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 44 44 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Niger?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 44 against 44 in Niger as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Niger?
0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Niger?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Niger rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 155th and Niger ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.