Antigua and Barbuda vs Uruguay: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Antigua and Barbuda
44
in 2019
Uruguay
44
in 2019
Antigua and Barbuda rank
155th
Uruguay rank
155th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Uruguay
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 44 against 44 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 155th and Uruguay ranks 155th of 188 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.6 | 44 | 1.6 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 44 | 44 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Antigua and Barbuda or Uruguay?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 44 against 44 in Uruguay as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Antigua and Barbuda and Uruguay?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Uruguay?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Uruguay rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 155th and Uruguay ranks 155th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.