Austria vs Comoros: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Austria
76
in 2019
Comoros
76
in 2019
Austria rank
27th
Comoros rank
27th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Austria
  • Comoros
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Austria currently reports 76 against 76 in Comoros, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Austria ahead.

Austria ranks 27th and Comoros ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Comoros Difference Ahead
2000s 79.2 76 3.2 Austria
2010s 76 76 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Austria or Comoros?
Austria, at 76 against 76 in Comoros as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Austria and Comoros?
0, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Comoros?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Austria and Comoros rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Austria ranks 27th and Comoros ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.