Bangladesh vs Botswana: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Bangladesh
56.88
in 2019
Botswana
56
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
105th
Botswana rank
107th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Botswana
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 56.88 against 56 in Botswana, a difference of 0.88.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.

Bangladesh ranks 105th and Botswana ranks 107th of 188 countries.

Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 63.2 34.4 28.8 Bangladesh
2010s 56.62 39.6 17.02 Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Bangladesh or Botswana?
Bangladesh, at 56.88 against 56 in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Bangladesh and Botswana?
0.88, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Botswana?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Bangladesh and Botswana rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Bangladesh ranks 105th and Botswana ranks 107th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.