Bangladesh vs Kenya: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Bangladesh
56.88
in 2019
Kenya
56
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
105th
Kenya rank
107th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Kenya
020406080100200520122019

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 56.88 against 56 in Kenya, a difference of 0.88.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Kenya ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 105th and Kenya ranks 107th of 188 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 63.2 91.2 28 Kenya
2010s 56.62 59.2 2.58 Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Bangladesh or Kenya?
Bangladesh, at 56.88 against 56 in Kenya as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Bangladesh and Kenya?
0.88, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Kenya?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Bangladesh and Kenya rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Bangladesh ranks 105th and Kenya ranks 107th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.