Bangladesh vs Sao Tome and Principe: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Bangladesh
56.88
in 2019
Sao Tome and Principe
56
in 2019
Bangladesh rank
105th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
107th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Bangladesh
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 56.88 against 56 in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.88.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 105th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 107th of 191 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.2 | 56 | 7.2 | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 56.62 | 56 | 0.616 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Bangladesh or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Bangladesh, at 56.88 against 56 in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 0.88, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bangladesh and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Bangladesh ranks 105th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 107th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.