Belarus, Republic of vs Burkina Faso: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Belarus, Republic of
60
in 2019
Burkina Faso
60
in 2019
Belarus, Republic of rank
92nd
Burkina Faso rank
92nd
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Belarus, Republic of
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Belarus, Republic of currently reports 60 against 60 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belarus, Republic of ahead.
Belarus, Republic of ranks 92nd and Burkina Faso ranks 92nd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Burkina Faso in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus, Republic of | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.2 | 24 | 7.2 | Belarus, Republic of |
| 2010s | 43.2 | 60 | 16.8 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Belarus, Republic of or Burkina Faso?
- Belarus, Republic of, at 60 against 60 in Burkina Faso as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Belarus, Republic of and Burkina Faso?
- 0, with Belarus, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus, Republic of and Burkina Faso?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Belarus, Republic of and Burkina Faso rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Belarus, Republic of ranks 92nd and Burkina Faso ranks 92nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.