Belgium vs Korea, Rep.: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Belgium
80
in 2019
Korea, Rep.
80
in 2019
Belgium rank
15th
Korea, Rep. rank
15th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Belgium
  • Korea, Rep.
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 80 against 80 in Korea, Rep., a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Korea, Rep. has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 15th and Korea, Rep. ranks 15th of 188 countries.

Korea, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Korea, Rep. Difference Ahead
2000s 80 84 4 Korea, Rep.
2010s 80 80.4 0.4 Korea, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Belgium or Korea, Rep.?
Belgium, at 80 against 80 in Korea, Rep. as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Belgium and Korea, Rep.?
0, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Korea, Rep.?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Belgium and Korea, Rep. rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Belgium ranks 15th and Korea, Rep. ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.