Belize vs El Salvador: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Belize
56
in 2019
El Salvador
56
in 2019
Belize rank
107th
El Salvador rank
107th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Belize
  • El Salvador
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Belize currently reports 56 against 56 in El Salvador, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Belize ahead.

Belize ranks 107th and El Salvador ranks 107th of 188 countries.

Belize has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize El Salvador Difference Ahead
2000s 56 48 8 Belize
2010s 56 49.6 6.4 Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Belize or El Salvador?
Belize, at 56 against 56 in El Salvador as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Belize and El Salvador?
0, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and El Salvador?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Belize and El Salvador rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Belize ranks 107th and El Salvador ranks 107th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.