Benin vs Micronesia (country): Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Benin
64
in 2019
Micronesia (country)
64
in 2019
Benin rank
70th
Micronesia (country) rank
70th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Benin
  • Micronesia (country)
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Benin currently reports 64 against 64 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Benin ahead.

Benin ranks 70th and Micronesia (country) ranks 70th of 188 countries.

Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Micronesia (country) Difference Ahead
2000s 76 64 12 Benin
2010s 68 64 4 Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Benin or Micronesia (country)?
Benin, at 64 against 64 in Micronesia (country) as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Benin and Micronesia (country)?
0, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Micronesia (country)?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Benin and Micronesia (country) rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Benin ranks 70th and Micronesia (country) ranks 70th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.