Bhutan vs Hungary: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Bhutan
36
in 2019
Hungary
32
in 2019
Bhutan rank
170th
Hungary rank
173rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Bhutan
  • Hungary
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 36 against 32 in Hungary, a difference of 4.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Hungary ahead.

Bhutan ranks 170th and Hungary ranks 173rd of 188 countries.

Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Hungary Difference Ahead
2000s 32 56 24 Hungary
2010s 33.6 43.6 10 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Bhutan or Hungary?
Bhutan, at 36 against 32 in Hungary as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Bhutan and Hungary?
4, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Hungary?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Bhutan and Hungary rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Bhutan ranks 170th and Hungary ranks 173rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.