Botswana vs Trinidad and Tobago: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Botswana
56
in 2019
Trinidad and Tobago
56
in 2019
Botswana rank
107th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
107th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Botswana
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 56 against 56 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 107th of 190 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 34.4 | 56 | 21.6 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 39.6 | 56 | 16.4 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Botswana or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Botswana, at 56 against 56 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Botswana and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Botswana and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Botswana ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 107th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.