Botswana vs United States: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Botswana
56
in 2019
United States
56.8
in 2019
Botswana rank
107th
United States rank
106th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Botswana
  • United States
0204060200520122019

How they compare

United States currently reports 56.8 against 56 in Botswana, a difference of 0.8.

Across all 15 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 107th and United States ranks 106th of 188 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana United States Difference Ahead
2000s 34.4 64 29.6 United States
2010s 39.6 57.76 18.16 United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Botswana or United States?
United States, at 56.8 against 56 in Botswana as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Botswana and United States?
0.8, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and United States?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Botswana and United States rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Botswana ranks 107th and United States ranks 106th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.