Bulgaria vs Indonesia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Bulgaria
48
in 2019
Indonesia
48
in 2019
Bulgaria rank
143rd
Indonesia rank
143rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Indonesia
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 48 against 48 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Indonesia has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 143rd and Indonesia ranks 143rd of 188 countries.

Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Indonesia Difference Ahead
2000s 48.8 52 3.2 Indonesia
2010s 48 50.8 2.8 Indonesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Bulgaria or Indonesia?
Bulgaria, at 48 against 48 in Indonesia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Bulgaria and Indonesia?
0, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Indonesia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Bulgaria and Indonesia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Bulgaria ranks 143rd and Indonesia ranks 143rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.