Cape Verde vs Greece: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Cape Verde
52
in 2019
Greece
52
in 2019
Cape Verde rank
123rd
Greece rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Greece
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 52 against 52 in Greece, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Greece ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 123rd and Greece ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Greece in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Greece Difference Ahead
2000s 52 60 8 Greece
2010s 52 51.2 0.8 Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Cape Verde or Greece?
Cape Verde, at 52 against 52 in Greece as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Cape Verde and Greece?
0, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Greece?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Cape Verde and Greece rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Cape Verde ranks 123rd and Greece ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.