Cameroon vs Nigeria: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Cameroon
56
in 2019
Nigeria
58.76
in 2019
Cameroon rank
107th
Nigeria rank
104th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Cameroon
  • Nigeria
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Nigeria currently reports 58.76 against 56 in Cameroon, a difference of 2.76.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cameroon ahead.

Cameroon ranks 107th and Nigeria ranks 104th of 188 countries.

Cameroon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cameroon Nigeria Difference Ahead
2000s 74.4 52 22.4 Cameroon
2010s 60 55.5 4.5 Cameroon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Cameroon or Nigeria?
Nigeria, at 58.76 against 56 in Cameroon as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Cameroon and Nigeria?
2.76, with Nigeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Nigeria?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Cameroon and Nigeria rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Cameroon ranks 107th and Nigeria ranks 104th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.