Central African Republic vs Greece: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Central African Republic
52
in 2019
Greece
52
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
123rd
Greece rank
123rd
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Greece
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 52 against 52 in Greece, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Greece ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 123rd and Greece ranks 123rd of 188 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Greece in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Greece | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52 | 60 | 8 | Greece |
| 2010s | 52 | 51.2 | 0.8 | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Central African Republic or Greece?
- Central African Republic, at 52 against 52 in Greece as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Central African Republic and Greece?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Greece?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Greece rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 123rd and Greece ranks 123rd of 188 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.