Central African Republic vs Iceland: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Central African Republic
52
in 2019
Iceland
52
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
123rd
Iceland rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Iceland
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 52 against 52 in Iceland, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 123rd and Iceland ranks 123rd of 188 groups.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Iceland Difference Ahead
2000s 52 52 0
2010s 52 52 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Central African Republic or Iceland?
Central African Republic, at 52 against 52 in Iceland as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Central African Republic and Iceland?
0, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Central African Republic and Iceland rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Central African Republic ranks 123rd and Iceland ranks 123rd of 188 groups.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.