Central African Republic vs Madagascar: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Central African Republic
52
in 2019
Madagascar
52
in 2019
Central African Republic rank
123rd
Madagascar rank
123rd
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Central African Republic
- Madagascar
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 52 against 52 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Madagascar has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 123rd and Madagascar ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Madagascar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52 | 64 | 12 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 52 | 56.4 | 4.4 | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Central African Republic or Madagascar?
- Central African Republic, at 52 against 52 in Madagascar as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Central African Republic and Madagascar?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Madagascar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Central African Republic and Madagascar rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Central African Republic ranks 123rd and Madagascar ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.