Colombia vs Gabon: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Colombia
68
in 2019
Gabon
68
in 2019
Colombia rank
55th
Gabon rank
55th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Colombia
  • Gabon
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Colombia currently reports 68 against 68 in Gabon, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gabon ahead.

Colombia ranks 55th and Gabon ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 1 and Gabon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Gabon Difference Ahead
2000s 63.2 64 0.8 Gabon
2010s 68 65.2 2.8 Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Colombia or Gabon?
Colombia, at 68 against 68 in Gabon as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Colombia and Gabon?
0, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Gabon?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Colombia and Gabon rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Colombia ranks 55th and Gabon ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.