Comoros vs United Arab Emirates: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Comoros
76
in 2019
United Arab Emirates
76
in 2019
Comoros rank
27th
United Arab Emirates rank
27th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • United Arab Emirates
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 76 against 76 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 188 countries.

Comoros has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
2000s 76 51.2 24.8 Comoros
2010s 76 70.4 5.6 Comoros

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Comoros or United Arab Emirates?
Comoros, at 76 against 76 in United Arab Emirates as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Comoros and United Arab Emirates?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and United Arab Emirates?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Comoros and United Arab Emirates rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Comoros ranks 27th and United Arab Emirates ranks 27th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.