Congo, Rep. vs Qatar: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Congo, Rep.
68
in 2019
Qatar
68
in 2019
Congo, Rep. rank
55th
Qatar rank
55th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Congo, Rep.
  • Qatar
020406080200520122019

How they compare

Congo, Rep. currently reports 68 against 68 in Qatar, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Congo, Rep. ahead.

Congo, Rep. ranks 55th and Qatar ranks 55th of 188 countries.

Congo, Rep. has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo, Rep. Qatar Difference Ahead
2000s 72 52 20 Congo, Rep.
2010s 69.6 60 9.6 Congo, Rep.

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Congo, Rep. or Qatar?
Congo, Rep., at 68 against 68 in Qatar as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Congo, Rep. and Qatar?
0, with Congo, Rep. ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Rep. and Qatar?
13 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
How do Congo, Rep. and Qatar rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Congo, Rep. ranks 55th and Qatar ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.