Costa Rica vs Ecuador: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Costa Rica
52
in 2019
Ecuador
52
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
123rd
Ecuador rank
123rd

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Ecuador
0204060200520122019

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 52 against 52 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 123rd and Ecuador ranks 123rd of 188 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 28 52 24 Ecuador
2010s 45.6 52 6.4 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Costa Rica or Ecuador?
Costa Rica, at 52 against 52 in Ecuador as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Costa Rica and Ecuador?
0, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Ecuador?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Costa Rica and Ecuador rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Costa Rica ranks 123rd and Ecuador ranks 123rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.