Costa Rica vs Madagascar, Republic of: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Costa Rica
52
in 2019
Madagascar, Republic of
52
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
124th
Madagascar, Republic of rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Madagascar, Republic of
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 52 against 52 in Madagascar, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Madagascar, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 124th and Madagascar, Republic of ranks 124th of 190 countries.
Madagascar, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Madagascar, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28 | 64 | 36 | Madagascar, Republic of |
| 2010s | 45.6 | 56.4 | 10.8 | Madagascar, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Costa Rica or Madagascar, Republic of?
- Costa Rica, at 52 against 52 in Madagascar, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Costa Rica and Madagascar, Republic of?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Madagascar, Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Madagascar, Republic of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 124th and Madagascar, Republic of ranks 124th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.