Costa Rica vs Papua New Guinea: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Costa Rica
52
in 2019
Papua New Guinea
52
in 2019
Costa Rica rank
124th
Papua New Guinea rank
124th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Costa Rica
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Papua New Guinea has been ahead every year.
Costa Rica ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 124th of 191 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28 | 52 | 24 | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 45.6 | 52 | 6.4 | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Costa Rica or Papua New Guinea?
- Costa Rica, at 52 against 52 in Papua New Guinea as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Costa Rica ranks 124th and Papua New Guinea ranks 124th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.