Côte d’Ivoire vs Croatia, Republic of: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Côte d’Ivoire
32
in 2019
Croatia, Republic of
32
in 2019
Côte d’Ivoire rank
175th
Croatia, Republic of rank
175th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Croatia, Republic of
How they compare
Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 32 against 32 in Croatia, Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Croatia, Republic of has been ahead every year.
Côte d’Ivoire ranks 175th and Croatia, Republic of ranks 175th of 190 countries.
Croatia, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d’Ivoire | Croatia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2 | 29.6 | 10.4 | Croatia, Republic of |
| 2010s | 23.2 | 32 | 8.8 | Croatia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Côte d’Ivoire or Croatia, Republic of?
- Côte d’Ivoire, at 32 against 32 in Croatia, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Côte d’Ivoire and Croatia, Republic of?
- 0, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d’Ivoire and Croatia, Republic of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Côte d’Ivoire and Croatia, Republic of rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Côte d’Ivoire ranks 175th and Croatia, Republic of ranks 175th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.