Cote d'Ivoire vs Moldova: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Cote d'Ivoire
32
in 2019
Moldova
36
in 2019
Cote d'Ivoire rank
173rd
Moldova rank
170th
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 36 against 32 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 4.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Cote d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 173rd and Moldova ranks 170th of 188 countries.
Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 19.2 | 8 | 11.2 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 23.2 | 7.6 | 15.6 | Cote d'Ivoire |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Cote d'Ivoire or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 36 against 32 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2019.
- What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Cote d'Ivoire and Moldova?
- 4, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Moldova rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 173rd and Moldova ranks 170th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.