Croatia vs Czechia: Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score

Croatia
32
in 2019
Czechia
36
in 2019
Croatia rank
173rd
Czechia rank
170th

Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score over time

  • Croatia
  • Czechia
010203040200520122019

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 36 against 32 in Croatia, a difference of 4.

That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 173rd and Czechia ranks 170th of 188 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Czechia Difference Ahead
2000s 29.6 36 6.4 Czechia
2010s 32 36 4 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score, Croatia or Czechia?
Czechia, at 36 against 32 in Croatia as of 2019.
What is the difference in dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score between Croatia and Czechia?
4, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Czechia?
15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do Croatia and Czechia rank globally for dealing with construction permits: procedures (number) - score?
Croatia ranks 173rd and Czechia ranks 170th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Dealing with construction permits: Procedures (number) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 2,783 data points, 2005–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the number procedures benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.